Make Money Without Investment
Money is not everything, but still all of us want money to do just everything. Money can’t buy emotions, but still money is needed for every little work and for the survival. Earning money is not a difficult task, but earning decent money according to your capabilities and skill is really very difficult. What can be much better to start making money without doing a single investment? So, here are some of the most brilliant ways to start earning money without spending a penny from your pocket.
The Top 5 Best Earning Apps of 2023
Out of all the online earning apps I have used and researched, these are the winners. Download each of one these legit apps to earn money from your mobile! I truly believe that these are the best apps to earn money online, even as a busy mom.
👇👇
Install Now
- Fiverr
- Upwork
- Freelancer
- PeoplePerHour
- Guru
Home Affordability Calculator Footnote1(Opens Overlay)
This calculator helps you estimate how much home you can afford. Simply enter your monthly income, expenses and expected interest rate to get your estimate. Adjust the loan terms to see your estimated home price, loan amount, down payment and monthly payment change as well. Once you find the price you can afford, contact a Home Lending Advisor or go to your local branch to get started.
👇👇
Install Now
The nation’s leading health insurers are experiencing an embarrassment of profits.
Some of the largest companies, including Anthem, Humana and UnitedHealth Group, are reporting second-quarter earnings that are double what they were a year ago. And while insurance profits are capped under the Affordable Care Act, with the requirement that consumers should benefit from such excesses in the form of rebates, no one should expect an immediate windfall.
But the amounts that insurers are retaining have caught the attention of the Trump administration. The Health and Human Services Department advised companies to consider speeding up rebates, and on Tuesday suggested that they reduce premiums to help consumers through the economic downturn caused by the pandemic.
Just this Wednesday, CVS Health, which owns Aetna, the big insurer, posted much higher earnings. CVS, which also owns a large pharmacy benefit manager and a drugstore chain, said net income for the second quarter reached $3 billion, about $1 billion more than it reported for the same period of 2019, on revenues of $65 billion.
Others had already trumpeted blockbuster results, ensuring that their stocks weathered swings in the markets. Anthem’s net income soared to $2.3 billion for the second quarter, from $1.1 billion in 2019, while UnitedHealth reported net earnings of $6.7 billion, compared to $3.4 billion for the same three months last year.
👇👇
Install Now
Sell Your Policy
Selling life insurance as an investment is a popular way to make money. You can sell whole life insurance, universal life insurance, or term life insurance. These are called life settlements.
- Whole life insurance policies have a cash value that increases over time.
- Universal life insurance policies have both cash value and death benefit protection.
- Term life insurance only has death benefit protection.
When you sell life insurance, you earn a commission on the sale. The commission’s size depends on the policy type and company you sell it for.
Retirement Plans
You can also use universal or whole life insurance as a retirement vehicle. There are two popular ways to do this.
- One way is to purchase a policy and let the cash value grow over time. Then, when you retire, you can use the cash value to supplement your income.
- The other way is to purchase a policy and borrow against the cash value. You can use the loan for any purpose, such as buying a new car or taking a vacation. In addition, the interest rate on the loan will be lower than what you would pay if you borrowed from a bank.
The real median earnings of all workers (including part-time and full-time workers) increased 4.6% between 2020 and 2021, while median earnings of those who worked full-time, year-round decreased 4.1%. Between 2020 and 2021, the change in the number of total workers was not statistically significant; however, there was an increase of about 11.1 million full-time, year-round workers (from approximately 106.3 million to 117.4 million), suggesting a shift from part-time or part-year in 2020 to full-time, year-round work in 2021.
The official poverty rate in 2021 was 11.6%, with 37.9 million people in poverty. Neither the rate nor the number in poverty was significantly different from 2020. The SPM rate in 2021 was 7.8%, a decrease of 1.4 percentage points from 2020. This is the lowest SPM poverty rate since estimates were first published in 2009 and the third consecutive annual decline.
In 2021, private health insurance coverage continued to be more prevalent than public coverage, at 66.0% and 35.7%, respectively. Some people may have more than one coverage type during the calendar year. Of the subtypes of health insurance, employer-based insurance was the most common subtype of health insurance, covering 54.3% of the population for some or all of the calendar year.
These findings come from three Census Bureau reports: Income in the United States: 2021, Poverty in the United States: 2021, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2021. This is the first year that official poverty and SPM estimates are released in the same report. While the official poverty measure is based on the concept of money income, which is pretax and does not include stimulus payments and tax credits, the SPM is a post-tax and transfer poverty measure. The SPM provides an alternative way of measuring poverty in the United States and serves as an additional indicator of economic well-being. The Census Bureau has published poverty estimates using the SPM annually since 2011 in collaboration with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).
For consistency with past reports, the income estimates in the “Income in the United States: 2021” report are based on the concept of money income. Appendix C of the income report provides post-tax estimates of median household income and income inequality metrics.
All three reports are based on data from the CPS ASEC. The Current Population Survey (CPS), sponsored jointly by the Census Bureau and BLS, is conducted every month and is the primary source of labor force statistics for the U.S. population. It is used to calculate monthly unemployment rate estimates. Supplements are added in most months. The CPS ASEC — conducted in February, March and April — is designed to provide annual, national estimates of income, poverty and health insurance estimates, collecting information about job status, income and health insurance coverage during the prior calendar year. Estimates for 2020 in these reports will not match those published last year due to the implementation of the 2020 Census-based population controls. The working paper, Effects of 2020 Census-Based Population Controls on 2020 Income, Poverty, Supplemental Poverty, and Health Insurance in the United States Estimates provides details.
During collection of the 2022 CPS ASEC, in-person interviews resumed except for in geographic areas with a high risk of exposure to COVID-19. The response rate for the CPS basic household survey declined from about 76% in March 2021 to 72% in March 2022. Since the response rates remain below prepandemic levels, which were regularly above 80%, it is important to examine how respondents differ from nonrespondents, as this difference could affect estimates. For more details on how sample differences and the associated nonresponse bias impact income and official poverty estimates, refer to the Research Matters blog: “How Did the Pandemic Affect Survey Response.”.
Income
- Real median household income was $70,784 in 2021, not statistically different from the 2020 estimate of $71,186.
- Median incomes were highest in the West ($79,430) and the Northeast ($77,472), followed by the Midwest ($71,129) and the South ($63,368) in 2021. The difference in 2021 median household incomes for the Northeast and the West was not statistically significant. None of the regions experienced a statistically significant change in median household income between 2020 and 2021. The differences among the 2020 to 2021 percent changes in median household income for the regions were not statistically significant.
- The Gini index is a statistical measure of income inequality ranging from 0.0 to 1.0. It measures the amount that any two incomes differ, on average, relative to mean income. It is an indicator of how far apart or “spread out” incomes are from one another. A value of 0.0 represents perfect equality, and a value of 1.0 indicates total inequality. Based on the money income Gini index, income inequality increased by 1.2 percent between 2020 and 2021 (from 0.488 to 0.494); this represents the first time the Gini index has shown an annual increase since 2011.
Race and Hispanic Origin
Race data refer to people reporting a single race only. Hispanic people can be of any race.
- Real median household incomes in 2021 for non-Hispanic White, Black, Asian and Hispanic populations were not statistically different from 2020. Among the race groups, Asian households had the highest median income ($101,418) in 2021, followed by non-Hispanic White ($77,999), and Hispanic ($57,981) people. Black households had the lowest median income ($48,297). The differences among the 2020 to 2021 percentage changes in household median income for the race groups were not statistically significant.
Earnings
- Between 2020 and 2021, the change in the number of total workers was not statistically significant; however, there was an increase of about 11.1 million full-time, year-round workers (from approximately 106.3 million to 117.4 million), suggesting a shift from working part-time or part-year in 2020 to full-time, year-round work in 2021.
- The real median earnings of all workers (including part-time and full-time workers) increased 4.6% (from $43,461 to $45,470) between 2020 and 2021, while median earnings of those who worked full-time, year-round decreased 4.1%, from $58,897 in 2020 to $56,473 in 2021.
- Consistent with the findings for all full-time, year-round workers, median earnings among men ($61,180) and women ($51,226) who worked full-time, year-round decreased by 4.7% and 4.0%, respectively, between 2020 and 2021. The differences between the 2020 to 2021 percentage changes in median earnings of full-time, year-round men and women were not statistically significant.
Post-Tax Income and Inequality Estimates
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) in 2021 to aid individuals and families. ARPA provided additional income in the form of a third stimulus payment (economic impact payment) that was sent to households starting March 2021. ARPA also changed several refundable tax credits, including expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit to filers without children and making the Child Tax Credit (CTC) and Child and Dependent Care Credit fully refundable. Given the large scale of the stimulus payment and tax credits, it is important to account for them in income and inequality estimates. Post-tax income is defined as money income net of federal and state taxes and credits, payroll taxes (FICA), the third stimulus payment, and state stimulus payments. Appendix C of the income report compares household median income and inequality measures based on post-tax income.
- Real median post-tax household income in 2021 was not statistically different from 2020.
- In contrast to the 1.2% increase in the Gini index using pretax income between 2020 and 2021, the annual percentage change in the Gini index calculated using post-tax income was not statistically significant.
Poverty
As defined by the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Statistical Policy Directive 14 and updated for inflation using the Consumer Price Index, the weighted average poverty threshold for a family of four in 2021 was $27,740. for the complete set of thresholds that vary by family size and composition.
Official Poverty Measure
- The official poverty rate in 2021 was 11.6%, with 37.9 million people in poverty. Neither the rate nor the number in poverty was significantly different from 2020.
- Official poverty rates decreased for people under the age of 18 and increased for people 65 years and older but were not statistically different for 18- to 64-year-olds.
- The majority of demographic groups discussed in this report did not experience significant changes in their official poverty rates between 2020 and 2021.
Supplemental Poverty Measure
While the official poverty measure includes only pretax money income, the SPM extends the official poverty measure by taking into account many of the government programs designed to assist low-income families and individuals that are not included in the current official poverty measure, such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), as well as stimulus payments and expansions to refundable tax credits enacted as part of economic relief legislation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Of particular note, ARPA increased the value of the CTC and made it fully refundable, meaning that more families were eligible to receive it.
Additionally, the SPM deducts necessary expenses for critical goods and services from income. Deducted expenses include income and payroll taxes, child care, commuting expenses, contributions toward the cost of medical care and health insurance premiums, and child support paid to another household. The SPM permits the examination of the effects of government transfers on poverty estimates. The SPM does not replace the official poverty measure and is not used to determine eligibility for government programs.
- The SPM rate in 2021 was 7.8%, a decrease of 1.4 percentage points from 2020. This is the lowest SPM poverty rate since estimates were first published in 2009 and the third consecutive decline.
- Social Security continued to be the most important antipoverty program in 2021, moving 26.3 million people out of SPM poverty. Meanwhile, refundable tax credits and stimulus payments moved 9.6 million and 8.9 million people out of SPM poverty.
- The share of the population with resources below 50% of their poverty threshold was lower for the SPM than for the official poverty measure with a consistent universe. In particular, 1.4% of children had SPM resources below half their SPM poverty threshold, compared to 7.2% using the official poverty methodology.
- Using a three-year average for 2019-2021, SPM rates were higher than those using the official poverty measure with a consistent universe in three states, lower in 38 states, and not statistically different in nine states and the District of Columbia.
- SPM rates were higher than official poverty rates in California, Maryland and New Jersey.
- SPM rates were lower than official poverty rates in 38 states: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
- SPM and official poverty rates were not statistically different in nine states: Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Virginia and Washington.
Age
- SPM child poverty rates fell 46% in 2021, from 9.7% in 2020 to 5.2% in 2021, a 4.5 percentage-point decline. This is the lowest SPM child poverty rate on record. In 2021, SPM child poverty rates fell for non-Hispanic White (2.7%), Black (8.1%) and Hispanic (8.4%) children, also their lowest rates on record. SPM rates for Black and Hispanic children were not statistically different. The SPM rates for Asian children in 2021 were not statistically different from 2020.
- SPM rates decreased for 18- to 64-year-olds, while increasing for people age 65 and older.
Health Insurance
The CPS ASEC asks people about coverage during the previous calendar year. People are considered to be insured if they were covered by any type of health insurance for part or all of the previous calendar year. People are considered uninsured if, for the entire year, they were not covered by any type of insurance. Among the findings:
- More people were insured in 2021 than 2020. In 2021, 8.3% of people, or 27.2 million, did not have health insurance at any point during the year, representing a 0.4 percentage-point decrease in the uninsured rate and a 1.1 million drop in the number of uninsured from 2020.
- In 2021, private health insurance coverage continued to be more prevalent than public coverage, at 66.0% and 35.7%, respectively. Of the subtypes of health insurance coverage, employer-based insurance was the most common, covering 54.3% of the population for some or all of the calendar year.
- Between 2020 and 2021, public coverage increased by 1.2 percentage points to 35.7%, driven by a 0.9 percentage-point increase in Medicaid coverage.
- The uninsured rate among children under age 19 decreased 0.6 percentage points to 5.0% between 2020 and 2021. During that period, there was a 1.3 percentage-point increase in public coverage of children under age 19.
- Between 2020 and 2021, public coverage rates increased for all workers ages 15 to 64. Among full-time, year-round workers, 7.9% had public health insurance in 2021, up 1.8 percentage points from 2020, in part due to the changing composition of the labor force through the pandemic and following the 2020 recession. Among part-time or part-year workers, the percentage with public coverage increased 1.6 percentage points to 22.6% during this period, which may be related to policies to address the COVID-19 public health emergency.
Regional estimates are available for income, poverty and health insurance coverage in each respective report. There is also a table showing state-level poverty rates using three-year averages.
The CPS ASEC is subject to sampling and nonsampling errors. All comparisons made here and in each respective report have been tested and found to be statistically significant at the 90% confidence level, unless otherwise noted.
